Review (August 2025)
The wildlife trusts are a federation of 46 independent wildlife conservation charities covering the whole of the uk. we manage nature reserves, help children to learn about nature and campaign to protect our seas.
2.15M
Estimated Revenue
476.74k
Website Visitors
2.7/5
Trustpilot Score
What do we know about The Wildlife Trusts?
Estimated Revenue (2020)
$2.15M
Total Employees
120
Founded
1912
Industry
Nonprofit Organization Management
Location
Newark-on-Trent, United Kingdom
About
The Wildlife Trusts: The Wildlife Trusts are a federation of 46 independent wildlife conservation charities covering the whole of the UK. We manage nature reserves, help children to learn about nature and campaign to protect our seas.
What is The Wildlife Trusts's Revenue?
The Wildlife Trusts's estimated revenue for 2024 is $2.15M.
What does The Wildlife Trusts do?
We manage thousands of nature reserves and run marine conservation projects around our coasts. There are 46 Wildlife Trusts covering the UK, the Isle of Man and Alderney. Each of the 46 Wildlife Trusts is an independent, autonomous charity with its own trustees, whose primary concern is the conservation of nature within its own geographical area. Wildlife Trusts are split into regions; a single Trust covers Scotland; Wales has six Trusts which work increasingly closely together; there are Trusts for Ulster, the Isle of Man, Alderney and the Isles of Scilly and 35 Trusts across England largely based on the old county boundaries or small groupings of such counties. We work together as The Wildlife Trusts
What are the monthly traffic metrics for Wildlifetrusts?
6/mo Traffic Growth
-51.70%
All Time Traffic Growth
Create Free Account
Monthly Hits
477k
Time on Site
0.7Mins
Pages per Visit
1.0
Bounce Rate
81%
How fast is Wildlifetrusts growing?
Wildlifetrusts has grown by 1.5% in the last 6 months according to SimilarWeb.
How do people interact with Wildlifetrusts?
Last month, Wildlifetrusts received 477k visitors who spent an average of 0.7 minutes on the website and visited 1.0 different pages per session. Overall, 81% of people bounce on the first visit.
How do people find Wildlifetrusts?
77.6k people (16%) visit Wildlifetrusts directly. 372.8k (78%) people search for them in Google. Whereas, 14.5k (3%) discover Wildlifetrusts through Facebook, Reddit, and YouTube. 1.7k (0%) visitors come from Wildlifetrusts's email newsletters. Finally, 0 (0.0%) people come from affiliates and or paid referrals.
Who uses Wildlifetrusts?
Wildlifetrusts's top market is the United Kingdom and they receive 339k (71.1%) people.Then the 2nd is United States with 70k (14.7%).The 3rd is is Ireland with 7.8k (1.6%).
Traffic Growth (last 6 months)
What do Wildlifetrusts's customers say about them?
Review Score
2.7/5
Total Reviews
5
Info
The Wildlife Trusts5 Star
25.0%
4 Star
0.0%
3 Star
0.0%
2 Star
0.0%
1 Star
75.0%
Read reviews that mention
fern slater
You have the time to organise and fund…
Reviewed on 2021-05-21T02:35:45
You have the time to organise and fund staff and a marquee in my local town , yet you don’t have the time to help with funding for a protected species crossing (toads) !
I will not support you.
I find it odd that you would also hire staff who clearly have no interest in our wildlife when they’re many people that have a huge passion for it .
read more
Graham Tidball
Don't visit Crickley Hill in Gloucester…
Reviewed on 2019-10-23T16:07:28
Don't visit Crickley Hill in Gloucester unless you want to be scammed with big parking fine.We visited paid £3 and entered our car registration. Happy to pay this as its a good cause and I testing walk. We did not get a ticket issued but thought that was OK as it was a camera and registration recognition system. We thought all was OK so had a walk and visited the cafe thinking we had supported a good cause. We then a week later get a parking fine from Minster Baywatch for £ 60 we appealed and they can't prove we did not pay but we still get fined £100 now if we appeal further. Its a parking rip off and shameful that the wild life Trust supports this. Lots of similar reviews that proves the technology is faulty but you have to pay if you are an unlucky one that gets this treatment. Just avoid the place if you don't want to risk a fine like many others have since this technology was put in place.
read more
Catherine Andrews
Fantastic charity
Reviewed on 2019-08-26T21:51:49
Fantastic charity
Welsh Reviewer
Wildife Trusts - yet they publicly support killing wildlife
Reviewed on 2018-07-04T20:42:35
Wildlife organisations are made up of people, and therefore can be as prejudiced as any other organisation - they choose one animal to protect,another to kill. Grey squirrels are one of their more frequent targets, since they see grey squirrels as immigrants having an effect on the wildlife organisation's favoured "pure" squirrels. Good old speciesism.
Killing wildlife is killing wildlife.
The Wildlife Trusts support killing grey squirrels. The Wildlife Trust are part of Red Squirrels United, who will be "training" volunteers to cull greys, probably with clubs. Sounds lovely, doesn't it.
The Wildlife Trust had a page about squirrels, and did their best to hide their plans. Amongst a whole page of text was one innocuous line with a vague mention of controlling grey squirrels. It would make you think they were planning something harmless, like setting up squirrel traffic lights. No. When they say "control of grey squirrels" it is a euphemism for killing them. Rather dishonest to try and hide their intentions in that way. It reminds me of the RSPB supporting killing certain birds (but doing their best to keep it quiet, especially from bird lovers, in case people got offended at their hypocrisy and stopped giving them money). Oh, and the Wildlife Trusts then deleted all their tweets and replies on the topic, presumably to try and bury the discussion and hide it from anyone searching for information.
The research is clear when it comes to culling - it does not help to boost red squirrel numbers. DNA profiling of red squirrels found that the vast majority living in the UK are descendants of imported reds, rather than native British reds. There is a wealth of evidence which also shows that red squirrel decline is mostly due to human activity, namely deforestation, and previous persecution. There are a bunch of studies here. In summary, there is no evidence to show that culling is an effective means of conserving red squirrels.
Yes, the real problem is not the colour of a squirrel, but human impact. Wildlife Trusts and organisations like that don't want to point the finger at the real cause though, in case it affects their donations. So they create scapegoats instead.
After this kind of hypocrisy from the company, I will no longer support them.
read more
You May Also Find These Company Reviews Interesting
Mightynetworks
Create or grow a website, community, online course, or paid membership site without coding. 14-day free trial.... More
Category
Business and Consumer Services